User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.4; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.137 Safari/537.36 LBBROWSER
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Chrome 34.0Win10 6.4unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Win10 6.4Windows DesktopDesktop0.069 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows 6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Liebao WebKit Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
LB Browser WebKit 537.36Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
LieBao Blink Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 34.0.1847.137closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:01 | by ThaDafinser