User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.0.1; en-us; GT-I6500U Build/ECLAIR) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I6500U Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.209 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.0.1GenericAndroid 2.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.0SamsungGT-I6500Usmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.0.1closeAndroid 2.0.1SamsungGT-I6500Ucloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android 2.0.1Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.0.1SamsungSaturnmobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.115 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:01 | by ThaDafinser