User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.2; en-ca; SAMSUNG-SGH-I957D Build/MASTER) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I957D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 3.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 3.2GenericAndroid 3.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.2SamsungSGH-I957Dsmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.2closeAndroid 3.2SamsungSGH-I957Dcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.17002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.13Android 3.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.13Android 3.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 8.9tabletyescloseclose0.04601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.133 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:36:00 | by ThaDafinser