User agent detail

ELinks/0.10.5 (textmode; OpenBSD 3.8 i386; 131x17-2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
OpenBSD 3.8 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
ELinks 0.10 OpenBSD Desktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ELinks 0.10.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Elinks 0.10.5closeBSD 3.8desktop-browsercloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Elinks 0.10Text-based OpenBSD 3.8desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeOpenBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
ELinks 0.10closeOpenBSD 3.8closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ELinks 0.10.5closeOpenBSD 3.8closecloseclosecloseclose0.08701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
ELinks OpenBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ELinks 0.10.5 OpenBSD 3.8desktopcloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:59 | by ThaDafinser