User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.5 (like Gecko) (Exabot-Thumbnails)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/Parser/fixtures/bots.yml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesExaleadBot/Crawler0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesExabot-Thumbnailsclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesExaBotCrawler0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesExabotclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 3.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesExabot Thumbnailsclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:59 | by ThaDafinser