User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; en-US; E380 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.3.0.552 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
UC Browser 10.3Android 4.4unknown AcerLiquid E3Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.3U3 Android 4.4AcerLiquid E3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2AcerE380mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.3WebKit Android 4.4yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.3.0closeAndroid 4.4.2LGE380closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.3.0.552WebKit 534.30Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.3Webkit 534.30Android 4.4.2AcerLiquid E3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:59 | by ThaDafinser