User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091215 Ubuntu/9.10 (karmic) Firefox/3.5.6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Firefox 3.5.6Ubuntu 9.10Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.138 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Ubuntu 9.10desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.6closeUbuntu 9.10closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.6Gecko 20091215Linux 9.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.6Gecko 1.9.1Ubuntu 9.10desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.6closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:59 | by ThaDafinser