User agent detail

NokiaE600/1.00(0)ActiveSync 3gpp-gba
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaE600 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NokiaE600 1.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close NokiaE600mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian NokiaE600smartphoneyes0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.00(0)ActivecloseNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close NokiaE600closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia E600closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NokiaE600mobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:58 | by ThaDafinser