User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; zh-cn; YTONE L999 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
QQ Browser 6.0Android 4.4.2WebKit YtoneL999smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit Android 4.4YtoneL999smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.0closeAndroid 4.4.2YTONE L999closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 6.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 6.0Webkit 537.36Android 4.4.2YTONE L999mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:58 | by ThaDafinser