User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) QupZilla/1.6.3 Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-788.php
QupZilla 1.6MacOSX 10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QupZilla 1.6WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QupZilla 1.6.3closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QupZilla 1.6.3closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QupZilla 1.6.3WebKit 538.1Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QupZilla 1.6.3Webkit 538.1OS X desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:58 | by ThaDafinser