User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; xx; YunOS/) AppleWebKit/536.28 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/536.28 Tanggula/0.1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-aliyun.yaml
Aliyun Browser Aliyun OS Webkit 536.28mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.079 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit YunOs desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1closeclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.20402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 536.28Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Aliyun Browser Webkit 536.28Aliyun OS mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:58 | by ThaDafinser