User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.2.3) Gecko/20100602 Gentoo Firefox/3.6.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.3Gentoo Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.109 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Gentoo desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.3closeGentoo closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.3Gecko 20100602Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.3Gecko 1.9.2Gentoo desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:58 | by ThaDafinser