User agent detail

Safari/10600.2.5 CFNetwork/720.1.1 Darwin/14.0.0 (x86_64)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-safari.yaml
Safari OS X Yosemite 10.10.1 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 8.0WebKit MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 10600.2.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari closeOS X 10.10.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.22902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac 10.10desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 720.1.1closeMac OS X 10.10.1Applecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari OS X Yosemite 10.10.1desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
CFNetwork App closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:58 | by ThaDafinser