User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (BREW; Opera Mini/6.0.3/27.2338; U; en) Presto/2.8.119 240X400 Pantech CDM89990
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechCDM89990 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.0Presto 2.2Brew 2.0Mobile Deviceyes0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.80closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.0.3close KyoceraE4520mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.0Presto Brew AudiovoxCDM-89990smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.0.3close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.0.3closeBREW PantechCDM89990closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.0.3close closecloseclosecloseclose0.09701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.0.3Presto 2.8.119 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6.0.3Presto 2.8.119Brew PantechCDM89990mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.80closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.0close KyoceraE4520Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.042 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:58 | by ThaDafinser