User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; MID Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.96 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.1unknown unknownMIDMobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.1MIDMobile Phoneyes0.218 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.31803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.1tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.1.1MIDcloseclosecloseclose0.02 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.96WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1China MID Tabletcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.1.1MIDtabletyescloseclose0.11601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.96closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 41closeAndroid 4.1GinovoMIDTabletyesyescloseclose0.092 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:57 | by ThaDafinser