User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; LG-F370S Build/KOT49I.F370S10h) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.94 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.4unknown LGF70Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.4LGF70Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272.94closeAndroid 4.4.2LGF370Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.26603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 41.0Blink Android 4.4LGF370Ssmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.4.2LGF370Scloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.12201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2LGLGF370Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.4.2LGF70mobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 41closeAndroid 4.4LGF370SSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.062 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:57 | by ThaDafinser