User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV; TSBNetTV/T38014006.0203.0DD; TVwithVideoPlayer; like Gecko) NetFront/4.1 DTVNetBrowser/2.2 (000039;T38014006;0203;0DD) InettvBrowser/2.2 (000039;T38014006;0203;0DD)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Generic_InettvT38014006 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.233 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1close GenericSmartTVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.38604 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront Toshibatv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.1close T38014006closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet TV Browser 2.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 ToshibaSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.022 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:57 | by ThaDafinser