User agent detail

FLY_E141TV_PLUS/ WAP Browser/MAUI(HTTP PGDL;HTTPS)Profile/Q03C1-2.40 ru-RU
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
FlyE141TV PLUSfeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
MAUI Wap Browser JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.055 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
FLY closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo Q 3closeMRE FlyE141TV PLUSmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
FlyE141TV PLUSfeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
MAUI based WAP Browsercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 3C MRE FlyE141TV PLUSmobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:57 | by ThaDafinser