User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.3; U; Series60/3.2 Nokia6650fold/04.18; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6650fold Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.136 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 3.2Nokia6650foldmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2 Symbian OS Series 60 3.2Nokia6650foldsmartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 04.18;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.2closeSymbian OS 9.3Nokia6650foldcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSymbianOS 9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.11001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 6650foldcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 3.2Nokia6650foldmobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 5.0NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:57 | by ThaDafinser