User agent detail

Nokia1120/2.0 (03.26) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia1120 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.077 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia1120 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Nokia1120mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokia1120smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia1120closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser NokiaOS NokiaNokia 1120closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia1120mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:57 | by ThaDafinser