User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-ca; GT-S5690R Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5690R Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy Xcovermobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungGT-S5690Rsmartphoneyes0.015 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-S5690Rcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy Xcovermobile:smartyescloseclose0.04 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-S5690RSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.107 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:56 | by ThaDafinser