User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; xx) AppleWebKit/538+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/8.0 Safari/538.15+ Midori/0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-midori.yaml
Midori 0.5 Webkit 538desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 8.0WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.119 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 8.0closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.5WebKit Mac desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 8.0closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.5closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.5closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.07301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.5WebKit 538Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.5Webkit 538 desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0.3closeIntel Mac OS X 10_10 Desktopcloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:56 | by ThaDafinser