User agent detail

NokiaC3-00/5.0 (08.70) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-392.php
Nokia Browser 0.0SymbianOS unknownunknown NokiaC3Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia Browser WebKit SymbianOS NokiaC3Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close NokiaC3-00mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian NokiaC3-00smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close NokiaC3-00closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia C3-00closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 NokiaC3-00mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close NokiaC3-00Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.031 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:56 | by ThaDafinser