User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; LG-P716 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML, Like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.166 Mobile Safari/535.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGP716 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 18.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.103 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.2LGP716mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 18.0WebKit Android 4.1LGP716smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 18.0.1025closeAndroid 4.1.2LGP716closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1025.166WebKit 535.19Android 4.1.2LGLGP716closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 18Webkit 535.19Android 4.1.2LGOptimus L7 II Dualmobile:smartyescloseclose0.033 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.166closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.1LGP716Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.17 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:55 | by ThaDafinser