User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.1.15 AQUOSBrowser/2.0 (US01DTV;V;0001;0001)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-513.php
Espial TV Browser 6.1unknown unknownunknown 531.2SharpAquos TVTV Device Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpAquos TVTV Device0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Espial 6.1.15close media-playercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Espial TV Browser 6.1WebKit SharpAquos Net Plustv0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.1.15close closeclosecloseclose0.029 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Espial 6.1.15Webkit 531.2 SharpAquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SharpAQUOS TV BrowserSmart-TVcloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:55 | by ThaDafinser