User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.30 UBrowser/5.2.3129.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 5.2Windows 7Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.056 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.30closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.30closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.30closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.30WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 5.2Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.30closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.057 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:55 | by ThaDafinser