User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (PlayStation Vita 3.01) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Silk/3.2 VTE/2.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/sony.yaml
3.01Webkit 536.26SonyPlaystation TVgaming:portableyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 3.2WebKit Android SonyPlaystation VitaConsoleyes0.078 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Browser 3.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
PS Vita browser 3.2closeLiveArea SonyPlayStation Vitamobile-browseryescloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 3.2Blink PlayStation Portable VitaSonyPlayStation Vitaconsoleyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX close SonyPlayStation Vitacloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk NetFront 536.26LiveArea 3.01SonyPlayStation Vitacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 536.26 3.01SonyPlaystation TVgaming:consolecloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
PlayStation Vita closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyPlayStation VitaOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:54 | by ThaDafinser