User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8B117 Safari/6531.22.7 (compatible; Mediapartners-Google/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesAdSense BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAdSense BotBot/Crawler0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 4.0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 4.0.5closeiOS 4.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesMediapartners-Googleclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 4.0.5closeiPhone OS 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.20802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Google's Media Partners system (AdSense) WebKit 532.9iOS 4.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Mediapartnersclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGoogle Mediapartnersclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.0.5closeiOS 4.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:54 | by ThaDafinser