User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008100314 GranParadiso/3.0.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox Gran Paradiso 3.0.3Linux Gecko 1.9.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.0Gecko 1.9.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (GranParadiso) 3.0.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox GranParadiso (3.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
GranParadiso 3.0.3closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
GranParadiso 3.0.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.0.3Gecko 2008100314Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Gran Paradiso 3.0.3Gecko 1.9.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:54 | by ThaDafinser