User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; en_US) KHTML/4.13.0 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.13
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.13Linux KHTML 4.13.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.13KHTML 4.13Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.13KHTML GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.13closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.13 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.55905 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.13KHTML 4.13.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:54 | by ThaDafinser