User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Opera Mini/7.1.32052/30.3697; en-US; GT-S6812) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.0.0.366 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Opera Mini 7.1.32052GNU/Linux Presto SamsungGT-S6812smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.0U2 Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.1Presto GNU/Linux SamsungGT-S6812smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux SamsungGT-S6812closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.0.0.366 Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.0Gecko Android SamsungGalaxy Famemobile:smartyescloseclose0.07301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:53 | by ThaDafinser