User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; SuperSpider/139; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
SuperSpider 139 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.5Trident WinME MEWindows DesktopDesktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows Meclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSuperSpiderclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.08101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:52 | by ThaDafinser