User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; es-es; T-112 Build/GRI40) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AudiosonicT-112 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.079 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.3GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.3closeAndroid 2.3.3AudiosonicT-112closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.3T-112mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.108 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:51 | by ThaDafinser