User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; T-17B Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.169 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AudiosonicT-17B Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.093 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.28006 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 25.0WebKit Android 4.1tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 25.0.1364closeAndroid 4.1.1AudiosonicT-17Bcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 25.0.1364.169WebKit 537.22Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41108 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 25Webkit 537.22Android 4.1.1T-17Btabletyescloseclose0.07201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.169closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.093 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:51 | by ThaDafinser