User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; Aquila_LE_080-0508 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.82 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CmxAquila_LE_080-0508 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.061 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.28506 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 30.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 30.0.1599closeAndroid 4.2.2CmxAquila_LE_080-0508closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.11802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 30.0.1599.82WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53211 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 30Blink Android 4.2.2Aquila_LE_080-0508tabletyescloseclose0.08601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.82closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.082 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:50 | by ThaDafinser