User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; AOL 9.7; AOLBuild 4343.1028; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/8.0; MAARJS)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-810.php
IE 12.0Win8 6.28.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 12.0Trident 8.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.075 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
AOL Explorer 9.7closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.20004 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows 8Acerdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AOL 9.7.4343closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
AOL 9.7closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.24105 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 8.0Windows Windows NT 6.2Acercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
AOL Desktop 9.7Trident 8.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:50 | by ThaDafinser