User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; Positivo Ypy L700 Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.114 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PositivoYpy L700 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.38308 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 34.0Blink Android 4.1tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 34.0.1847closeAndroid 4.1.1PositivoYpy L700closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.55011 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 34.0.1847.114WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.70214 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 34Blink Android 4.1.1PositivoYPY L700tabletyescloseclose0.038 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.095 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:49 | by ThaDafinser