User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-ie.yaml
Internet Explorer 5.5Windows ME desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.5Trident WinME MEWindows DesktopDesktop0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.5closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.35607 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows MEdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows Meclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.5closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.16303 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.5Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56411 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.5 Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 5.5closeWindows 2000Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:49 | by ThaDafinser