User agent detail

BaiduHD/2.1.0 CFNetwork/459 Darwin/10.0.0d3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-baidu.yaml
Baidu Browser 2.1iPhone OS 3.1.3 mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 3.1AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
BaiduHD 2.1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Baidu Browser 2.1.0closeiOS 3.1.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.4901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iOS 3.1yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork closeiOS 4Applecloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.76915 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 2.1 iPhone OS 3.1.3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 3.1closeiOS 3.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:49 | by ThaDafinser