User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (N; Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) Raptr Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-other.yaml
Raptr Windows XPWebkit 534.34desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.34closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.39208 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.23305 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Raptr Web Browser WebKit 534.34Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53611 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Raptr Webkit 534.34Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:49 | by ThaDafinser