User agent detail

Opera/9.0 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
Opera 9.0WinXP 5.12.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.0Presto 2.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.55611 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.0Presto Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.11402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.0 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.37708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.02 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:49 | by ThaDafinser