User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/46.0.2486.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Chrome Dev 46.0.2486.0Fedora Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 46.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.057 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 46.0.2486.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 46.0.2486.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21904 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 46.0Blink Fedora desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 46.0.2486.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 46.0.2486closeFedora closeclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 46.0.2486.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.09002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 46.0.2486.0WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.52111 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 46.0.2486.0Blink Fedora desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 46.0.2486.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 46.0.2490.86closecompatible Desktopcloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:49 | by ThaDafinser