User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/6.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
IE 10.0WinVista 6.06.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.24305 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows Vistadesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 9.0closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.13503 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4781 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:48 | by ThaDafinser