User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; ARM; Trident/6.0; Touch; ARMBJS)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
IE 10.0WinRT8 6.26.0 unknowngeneral TabletTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0WinRT8 6.2Tabletyesyes0.10999 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18804 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows RT tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 10.0closeWindows RT MicrosoftSurface RTcloseclosecloseclose0.021 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.08302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4991 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows RTdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 10(Compatibility View)closeWindows 8MicrosoftTabletyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:47 | by ThaDafinser