User agent detail

MQQBrowser/3.0/Adr (Linux; U; 4.0.4; zh-cn; HUAWEI U8950D Build/U8950DV100R001C17B939;540*960)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiU8950D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser 3.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 3.0closeLinux SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.20004 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 3.0 GNU/Linux HuaweiU8950Dsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 3.0closeLinux HuaweiU8950Dcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 3.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40908 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.0 Android 4.0.4HuaweiAscend G600mobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonST25iSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05299 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:47 | by ThaDafinser