User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; OnePAD 90 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.64 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AirisOnePAD 90 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.07999 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.31606 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.0tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.0.4AirisOnePAD 90closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.14903 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.38108 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 28.0.1500.64Blink Android 4.0.4OnePAD 90tabletyescloseclose0.08101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.07899 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:47 | by ThaDafinser