User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.1; en-ca; GT-P7500M Build/HMJ37) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-P7500M Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 3.1SamsungGalaxy Tab 10.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.69614 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 3.1SamsungGALAXY Tab 10.1" P7500tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 3.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 3.1closeAndroid 3.1SamsungGT-P7500Mcloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.13Android 3.1Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41708 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.13Android 3.1SamsungGalaxy Tab 10.1tabletyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.1closeAndroid 3.1SamsungGT-P7500Tabletyesyescloseclose0.19898 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:47 | by ThaDafinser