User agent detail

Opera (Linux; U; 4.0.4; zh-cn; PantechP8010; 540*888) UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PantechP8010 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux PantechP8010smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 139closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeLinux PantechP8010closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40808 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9Gecko PantechP8010; 540*888) UCWEB7.9.0.94mobile:featureyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:46 | by ThaDafinser