User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; PPC Mac OS X; U; xx) Presto/2.6.30 Version/10.60
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 10.60OS X Presto 2.6.30desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 10.60Presto 2.2MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 10.60closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.20104 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.60Presto Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.60closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.60closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.60closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.06801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.60Presto 2.6.30Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45909 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 10.60Presto 2.6.30OS X desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 10.00closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:46 | by ThaDafinser