User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.2; U; Series60/3.1 NokiaN95_8GB-3/1.2.011 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 ) AppleWebKit/413 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/413
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN95_8GB-3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.40096 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 413closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.2NokiaN95 8GBmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18504 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 3.1NokiaN95smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia S60 OSS Browser 1.2.011closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia OSS Browser 3.1closeSymbian OS 9.2NokiaN95_8GB-3closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 OSS 3.1closeSymbianOS 9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.08502 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit 413NokiaOS NokiaNokia N95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43309 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 413Series60 3.1NokiaN95 8GBmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.2NokiaN95 8GBFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.09199 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:35:45 | by ThaDafinser